{"id":7712,"date":"2024-07-17T19:15:31","date_gmt":"2024-07-17T17:15:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/citationstyler.com\/?p=7712"},"modified":"2026-03-24T12:43:04","modified_gmt":"2026-03-24T11:43:04","slug":"popularity-of-reference-managers-over-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citationstyler.com\/en\/wissen\/popularitat-von-zitiersoftwares-im-verlauf-der-zeit\/","title":{"rendered":"About the popularity of citation software. Trends over the last 20 years."},"content":{"rendered":"

The use of citation and reference management software has changed considerably over the last few years. This development can be easily studied on the basis of search behaviour on Google. We look at the popularity of five well-known programmes: Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, JabRef and Citavi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Development of search queries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The following graphic from Google Trends<\/a> shows a comparison of the relative search interest for the five programmes from January 2004 to July 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Zitiersoftware
Citation software search in comparison since 2004. Graphic from Google Trends.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Clear trends can be recognised here:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Zotero<\/strong>: This open-source tool has steadily grown in popularity. Especially since 2021, there has been a steep increase, probably due to improvements in user-friendliness and the growing community. Zotero is particularly appreciated by academics who are looking for a free and flexible solution that has excellent support and a very active community of Plugin Developers<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Mendeley<\/strong>: After a strong growth phase from 2009 to 2016, Mendeley has more or less maintained its popularity, but has shown a downward trend since 2018. This could be related to the takeover by Elsevier and the associated changes to the software, which were met with displeasure by some users.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. EndNote<\/strong>: Die etablierte „Corporate“ Software, die oft \u00fcber Abonnements an Universit\u00e4ten zug\u00e4nglich war\/ist, zeigt eine recht konstanten R\u00fcckgang seit ~2011. EndNote ist besonders in institutionellen Umgebungen weit verbreitet, allerdings scheint die Konkurrenz durch kostenlose Alternativen zuzunehmen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. JabRef<\/strong>: As a lesser-known but powerful open-source tool, JabRef shows a stable but comparatively low search frequency and a steadily decreasing trend. JabRef's niche consists mainly of users who require specialised BibTeX management. However, this can now be covered very easily by Zotero.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Citavi<\/strong>: This software, which is particularly popular in German-speaking countries, shows a mixed picture. After a phase of growth until 2017, its popularity has declined somewhat, but could increase again thanks to new functions and integrations.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
    \"Zitiersoftware
    Die 5 Programme im \u00dcberblick als „Schnappsch\u00fcsse“<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    The graphic above clearly shows how strong and widespread EndNote once was, but has now almost been replaced by Zotero and Citavi. Even Mendeley can no longer keep up and has been left behind. As a very active member of the Zotero community, we have received many requests for help in the forum, especially in the last two years, when migrating from Mendeley to Zotero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n\n\n\n

    The data shows that the market for citation and reference management software is evolving dynamically and both established and new tools need to constantly expand their user base to remain relevant. Academics and researchers benefit from this diversity through greater choice and better customisation options to suit their individual needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Some key factors for the future development of citation software are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n